¿Qué pasa con este programa?¿Por qué no puedo push_back un unique_ptr en un vector?
#include <memory>
#include <vector>
int main()
{
std::vector<std::unique_ptr<int>> vec;
int x(1);
std::unique_ptr<int> ptr2x(&x);
vec.push_back(ptr2x); //This tiny command has a vicious error.
return 0;
}
El error:
$ g++ -std=gnu++0x main.cpp
In file included from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c+
+/mingw32/bits/c++allocator.h:34:0,
from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c+
+/bits/allocator.h:48,
from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c+
+/memory:64,
from main.cpp:6:
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/unique_ptr.h: I
n member function 'void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<_Tp>::construct(_Tp*,
const _Tp&) [with _Tp = std::unique_ptr<int>, _Tp* = std::unique_ptr<
int>*]':
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/stl_vector.h:74
5:6: instantiated from 'void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(con
st value_type&) [with _Tp = std::unique_ptr<int>, _Alloc = std::alloca
tor<std::unique_ptr<int> >, value_type = std::unique_ptr<int>]'
main.cpp:16:21: instantiated from here
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/unique_ptr.h:20
7:7: error: deleted function 'std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter>::uniqu
e_ptr(const std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter>&) [with _Tp = int, _Tp_D
eleter = std::default_delete<int>, std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter> =
std::unique_ptr<int>]'
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/ext/new_allocator.h:
105:9: error: used here
In file included from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c+
+/vector:69:0,
from main.cpp:7:
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/unique_ptr.h: I
n member function 'void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_M_insert_aux(std::v
ector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator, _Args&& ...) [with _Args = {const std::u
nique_ptr<int>&}, _Tp = std::unique_ptr<int>, _Alloc = std::allocator<
std::unique_ptr<int> >, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator = __gnu_cxx
::__normal_iterator<std::unique_ptr<int>*, std::vector<std::unique_ptr
<int> > >, typename std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Base::_Tp_alloc_type::p
ointer = std::unique_ptr<int>*]':
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/stl_vector.h:74
9:4: instantiated from 'void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(con
st value_type&) [with _Tp = std::unique_ptr<int>, _Alloc = std::alloca
tor<std::unique_ptr<int> >, value_type = std::unique_ptr<int>]'
main.cpp:16:21: instantiated from here
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/unique_ptr.h:20
7:7: error: deleted function 'std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter>::uniqu
e_ptr(const std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter>&) [with _Tp = int, _Tp_D
eleter = std::default_delete<int>, std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter> =
std::unique_ptr<int>]'
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/vector.tcc:314:
4: error: used here
Dado que solo puede haber uno, también se debe poder pasar un carácter temporal directamente al vector: 'vec.push_back (std :: unique_ptr (new int (1)));'. 'unique_ptr' también puede usar un eliminador personalizado (que no hace nada), pero luego debe tenerse en cuenta que la dirección de la variable local no es válida al final del alcance. –
UncleBens
Otra opción es usar 'emplace_back'. p.ej. 'vec.emplace_back (new int (1));' –
@deft_code: No, eso no es seguro. La operación 'emplace_back' puede arrojar, y si lo hace, se filtrará el' int' dinámicamente asignado. La regla general es que todas las asignaciones dinámicas deben ser propiedad de un puntero inteligente con nombre para evitar fugas. –